The term “pre-announcement price drift” refers to the tendency of financial asset prices to undergo significant changes before the official release of important economic data or financial announcements. Examining the phenomenon of pre-announcement price drift, we observe several key findings. Firstly, there are 7 economic data points where the pre-announcement price drift consistently aligns with the direction taken by the SP500 (E-mini futures) after the data release. These results are based on data from January 2008 to March 2014, where the pre-announcement price drift is quantified as a percentage of the total price change occurring in the 30 minutes before and after the data release. The specific percentages for each announcement are as follows:

  • ISM Non-Manufacturing Index: 69%
  • Pending Home Sales: 64%
  • Industrial Production: 60%
  • GDP: 56%
  • Existing Home Sales: 49%
  • ISM Manufacturing Index: 28%
  • Consumer Confidence Index (CB): 15%

These values are to be interpreted as “before the release of the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index data, the American stock market has already moved in the correct direction of the data, covering 69% of the total movement it will make in that direction.”

This phenomenon typically occurs about 30 minutes before the official data release time. This timing raises an important question: why do informed traders choose to act based on their knowledge only shortly before the data release? Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. Firstly, traders may seek to minimize their exposure to risks arising from unpredictable events. By trading closer to the data release time, they can reduce the uncertainty associated with last-minute market fluctuations. A second hypothesis suggests that informed traders strategically time their actions to coincide with periods of high trading volume. This approach can help them conceal their operations within the broader market activity, making them less noticeable. A third hypothesis posits that informed traders have access to crucial information just before the official release time, prompting them to act. Additionally, the data suggest that imbalances in the order flow (E-mini and 10-year Treasury) begin to accumulate about 30 minutes before the announcement, lending credence to these theories.

The data also reveal a noteworthy trend: an increase in the pre-announcement price drift after 2007. This period coincides with the end of the economic expansion phase and the onset of the global financial crisis. Two main factors contribute to this heightened drift. Firstly, the financial crisis induced a greater sense of uncertainty and volatility in financial markets. In times of economic turbulence, market operators become more sensitive to released data, causing greater price fluctuations. This reaction can explain the increase in pre-announcement price drift. Secondly, central banks began employing unconventional monetary policies, including measures such as quantitative easing, to address the impact of the crisis. These policies, often influenced by macroeconomic data, amplified the relevance of data announcements for financial markets. Essentially, the availability of a more powerful set of policy tools made economic data releases even more influential on market movements.

Although the U.S. government takes measures to safeguard sensitive economic data, the possibility of information leakage persists. Federal agencies implement strict security protocols, limiting the number of employees with access to such data and employing robust cybersecurity measures. However, cases of data leaks have occurred in the past.

A noteworthy aspect is that some economic data are collected and disseminated by private entities not subject to the same stringent regulatory guidelines as federal agencies. In particular, the Consumer Confidence Index, Industrial Production, Pending Home Sales, ISM Non-Manufacturing Index, and ISM Manufacturing Index are among the seven announcements showing significant pre-announcement price drift and are not subject to the same regulatory control. Furthermore, journalists are granted previews of economic data in closed “lock-up rooms” before the official release to allow them to publish news as soon as the data is released. However, this practice carries the risk of news leaks that could influence market behavior before the official release time.

When evaluating the impact of economic data on financial markets, it is essential to consider the accuracy of market expectations. Market operators rely on consensus forecasts, often calculated by entities like Bloomberg. However, these forecasts do not always reflect the most optimal predictions. For example, Bloomberg’s consensus forecasts assign equal weight to individual predictions, regardless of the resources invested to generate them. Some financial institutions allocate more substantial resources and expertise to forecasting economic data, potentially obtaining more accurate predictions. Moreover, unconventional sources of information are increasingly being explored. An interesting avenue is the use of Google Trends data for keyword research related to economic indicators, such as “jobs.” Research has shown that such keyword trends can be predictive of unemployment benefit data.

In conclusion, the concept of “pre-announcement price drift” sheds light on the intriguing phenomenon of financial asset prices experiencing significant shifts before the official release of crucial economic data. Ultimately, the study prompts us to reflect on the intricate connections between economic data, market behavior, and trader actions. What insights can be gained from this interplay, and how might it influence future discussions on market dynamics and information analysis?

Leave a Reply